DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
PRO2102432·marin·Probate·Probate
Hearing 3 months agoCONTINUED

DUCK YO QUOSS, ESTATE OF

Status Conference

Hearing date
May 21, 2026
Department
C
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jul 16, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Ruling

PRO2102432 DUCK YO QUOSS, ESTATE OF

Status Conference – Final Distribution or Report on Status of Administration.

Ruling. This matter is continued to July 16, 2026, at 10:00 a.m.

PRO2203072 ROBERT E. GREELEY, ESTATE OF

1. Status Conference – Status Report of Administration or Petition for Final Distribution.

2. Order – Show Cause – Sanctions.

Ruling. The Order to Show Cause is dismissed pursuant to the 5/18/26 Response. The Report of Status of Administration was not timely filed and is continued to June 18, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. to allow time for proper notice.

Petitioner is ordered to file the following no later than five Court days prior to hearing. (Super. Ct. Marin County, Local Rules, rule 6.2(b), Filing, Hearing, and Continuance Procedures.)

1. Proof of Service confirming that at least fifteen days’ notice of the Report of Status, including the request for preliminary distribution of the boat, was provided to all interested parties on the mandatory Judicial Council Form “Notice of Hearing – Decedent’s Estate or Trust” with the box checked in Item 1 stating this is a report of status of administration. (Judicial Council Forms, form DE-120.)

PLEASE NOTE: Probate cases that are designated as confidential by California law will not be posted online. For tentative rulings in those matters, please contact the judicial secretary at (415) 444- 7260. Page 12 | 15

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share