MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND/OR ADJUDICATION
be filed by Defendant no later than May 12, 2026; however, no compliance has been shown.
As previously indicated, the Court will not turn to the merits of the demurrer until strict compliance with Code of Civil Procedure section 430.41 is shown. Upon such a showing, Defendant may seek to have this matter reset.
11. TORRES VS. CITY OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND/OR HUNTINGTON BEACH ADJUDICATION
Regarding Defendant Malco Maintenance’s Motion for Summary Judgment on the City of Huntington Beach’s Cross-Complaint, the Court entered an order approving the good-faith settlement between Plaintiff and moving party on 5/15/26. Movant’s counsel shall appear at the hearing to state whether the motion should remain on the Court’s calendar in light of the approval of the good-faith settlement. If Movant is maintaining the motion, the Court will continue the hearing to allow moving Defendant and Cross- Complainant City to file supplemental briefs addressing the effect of the good faith settlement on the City’s Cross-Complaint.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”