DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
22CV016479·alameda·Civil·Personal Injury
Hearing 3 months agoDENIED

A. vs DOE 1

Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings

Hearing date
May 28, 2026
Department
17
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffA.
DefendantDOE 1
DefendantOAKLAND UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

Ruling

22CV016479: A. vs DOE 1 05/28/2026 Hearing on Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by OAKLAND UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT (Defendant) CRS# 134912569911 in Department 17

Tentative Ruling - 05/22/2026 Chad A. Stegeman

The Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by OAKLAND UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT on 05/04/2026 is Denied.

In light of the ruling in West Contra Costa Unified School District v. The Superior Court of Contra Costa County, the Motion of Defendant Oakland Unified School District (“Defendant”) for Judgment on the Pleadings is DENIED. (Code Civ. Proc., § 438, subd. (c)(1)(B)(ii); West Contra Costa Unified School District v. The Superior Court of Contra Costa County (2024) 103 Cal.App.5th 1243, 1264.)

As Defendant acknowledges, the Court of Appeal decided in West Contra Costa that AB 218’s retroactive waiver is not an unconstitutional gift of public funds. (West Contra Costa, supra, 103 Cal.App.5th at p. 1264.) It also reiterated that the power to waive or modify the claims presentation requirement for public entities under specific circumstances lies within the legislature’s discretion because tort liability against public entities is a statutory creation. (Id. at p. 1257.)

REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE

Defendant’s Request for Judicial Notice (“RJN”) is granted as to items 1 and 2, which consist of court records. (Evid. Code, § 452, subd. (d)(1).)

LAW

1. Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings – Legal Standard

A motion for judgment on the pleadings performs the same function as a general demurrer but is made after the time for demurrer has expired. (Cloud v. Northrop Grumman Corp. (1998) 67 Cal.App.4th 995, 999.) Like a demurrer, in a motion for judgment on the pleadings, any defect upon which a motion for judgment on the pleadings is based must appear on the face of the pleadings or from a matter which may be judicially noticed. (Code Civ. Proc. §, 438, subd. (d).) In a motion for judgment on the pleadings, all material facts pleaded in the complaint and those which arise by reasonable implication are deemed admitted by the moving party. (Nelson v. Tucker Ellis, LLP (2020) 48 Cal.App.5th 827, 839.)

ANALYSIS

Based on the ruling in Contra Costa alone, which is binding on this Court, Defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings must be denied. 22CV016479: A. vs DOE 1 05/28/2026 Hearing on Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by OAKLAND UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT (Defendant) CRS# 134912569911 in Department 17 The “primary and fundamental” inquiry in determining whether something can be regarded as a “gift” is “whether the money is to be used for a public or a private purpose.” (San Diego County v. Hammond (1936) 6 Cal.2d 709, 721.) It the action is for a “public purpose,” it is not regarded as a “gift.” (Ibid.)

A.B. 218 serves the public purpose of exposing long-hidden perpetrators, increasing public awareness of sexual assault and deterring future abuse, thereby increasing public safety, it does not constitute a “gift” as defined by the California Supreme Court because the public at large benefits from the amendment. (San Diego County v. Hammond (1936) 6 Cal.2d 709, 721.) The Court of Appeal has taken this position in its analysis in Contra Costa, supra, 103 Cal.App.5th 1243, concluding that A.B. 218 does not constitute a gift of public funds.

Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings rests entirely on this basis, and is therefore DENIED. (Code Civ. Proc., § 438, subd. (c)(1)(B)(ii); Contra Costa, supra, 103 Cal.App.5th 1243.)

If a party does not timely contest the foregoing Tentative Ruling and appear at the hearing, the Tentative Ruling will become the order of the court.

HOW DO I CONTEST A TENTATIVE RULING?

THROUGH ECOURT Notify the Court and all the other parties no later than 4:00 PM one court day before the scheduled hearing, and briefly identify the issues you wish to argue through the following steps: 1. Log into eCourt Public Portal 2. Case Search 3. Enter the Case Number and select “Search” 4. Select the Case Name 5. Select the Tentative Rulings Tab 6. Select “Click to Contest this Ruling” 7. Enter your Name and Reason for Contesting 8. Select “Proceed”

BY EMAIL Send an email to the DEPARTMENT CLERK and all the other parties no later than 4:00 PM one court day before the scheduled hearing. This will permit the department clerk to send invitations to counsel to appear remotely.

BOTH ECOURT AND EMAIL notices are required.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share