DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
23CV000320·sacramento·Civil·Case Management Conference
Hearing over 2 years agoThe Case Management Conference is continued to 05/23/2025.

Tenango vs The Regents of the University of California, et al.

Case Management Conference

Hearing date
Mar 22, 2024
Department
43
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
May 23, 2025
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

Plaintiff (Minor)Ivan Manuel Tenango
DefendantThe Regents of the University of California
DefendantMelissa Carol Matulich, M.D.
DefendantAnthony Nicholas Karnezis, M.D.
DefendantJeanette Patricia Tom-Lerman, M.D.
DefendantLisa Diane Mills, M.D.
DefendantErik Gopal Laurin, M.D.
DefendantMichael David Trifiro, M.D.
DefendantGene H Kurosawa, M.D.
DefendantTehani Liyanage, M.D.
DefendantScott Zakaluzny, M.D.
DefendantZahabiya H Chithiwala, M.D.
DefendantAustin Holmes, M.D.

Attorneys

Samuel Raye Dordulianfor Ivan Manuel Tenango
Carolyn Laney Northropfor The Regents of the University of California
Carolyn Laney Northropfor Melissa Carol Matulich, M.D.
Carolyn Laney Northropfor Anthony Nicholas Karnezis, M.D.
Carolyn Laney Northropfor Jeanette Patricia Tom-Lerman, M.D.
Carolyn Laney Northropfor Lisa Diane Mills, M.D.
Carolyn Laney Northropfor Erik Gopal Laurin, M.D.
Carolyn Laney Northropfor Michael David Trifiro, M.D.
Carolyn Laney Northropfor Gene H Kurosawa, M.D.
Carolyn Laney Northropfor Tehani Liyanage, M.D.
Carolyn Laney Northropfor Scott Zakaluzny, M.D.
Carolyn Laney Northropfor Zahabiya H Chithiwala, M.D.
Carolyn Laney Northropfor Austin Holmes, M.D.

Ruling

23CV000320: TENANGO vs THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, et al. 03/22/2024 Case Management Conference in Department 43

Tentative Ruling

Notices:

Any party who wishes to contest the tentative ruling below must: (1) request a hearing by calling the clerk in Department 43 at (916) 874-7561 no later than 4:00 p.m. on the Court day before the scheduled CMC, and (2) advise opposing counsel of the request. If a hearing is not requested by 4:00 p.m. on the Court day before the scheduled CMC, the tentative ruling will become the final order of the Court.

If a hearing is requested, the Court assumes all parties will appear remotely via Zoom unless the Court orders in-person attendance. The Department 43 Zoom ID is: 160 9096 1628. To appear telephonically via Zoom, call (833) 568-8864 and enter the Department 43 Zoom ID referenced above.

All parties requesting oral argument for Department 43 will be heard at 9:00 a.m. the day of the scheduled hearing.

Court’s Tentative Ruling:

No appearance is required under the following conditions:

On the Court's own motion, the Case Management Conference scheduled for 03/22/2024 is continued to 05/23/2025 at 08:30 AM in Department 43 at Gordon D. Schaber Superior Court.

New Case Management Statements shall be filed by all parties no later than 15 days prior to the hearing pursuant to Local Rule 2.51.

The Plaintiff is directed to serve the Defendants Melissa Carol Matulich, M.D., Emilie C. Dempsey, M.D., Suji Uhm, M.D., Nandini R. Nittur, M.D., Anthony Nicholas Karnezis, M.D., Jeanette Patricia Tom-Lerman, M.D., Bahar M. Kasimi, M.D., Lisa Diane Mills, M.D., Dylan F. Ely, M.D., Felix Shall-Gin Wong, M.D., Erik Gopal Laurin, M.D., Michael David Trifiro, M.D., Cinthia Tirado, M.D., Gene H. Kurosawa, M.D., Tehani Liyanage, M.D., Scott Zakaluzny, M.D., Scott D. Casey, M.D., Mark E. Evans, M.D., Zahabiya H.

Chithiwala, M.D., William Jhonghoon Yoon, M.D., Austin Holmes, M.D., Rebecca Ann Brooks, M.D., Eric Matthew Shurtleff, D.O., Garth Harrison Utter, M.D., Laura Galganski, M.D., Darrell G. Holmes, Jr., M.D., Mitchell Creinin, M.D., John M. Arriola, M.D., Elham Vali Betts, M.D. and Jose Tenango with the Complaint and shall diligently proceed to obtain the responsive pleading, default, or dismissal of Defendants as to the Complaint.

23CV000320: TENANGO vs THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, et al. 03/22/2024 Case Management Conference in Department 43

The Plaintiff shall diligently proceed to obtain the responsive pleadings, defaults, or dismissals of Defendants The Regents of the University of California as to the Complaint.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share