| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
Request for Order
LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DEPARTMENT 5 May 21, 2026 8:30 AM/1:30 PM
4. LISA PURVES V. SCOTT PURVES PFL20010383
On November 17, 2025, Petitioner filed a Request for Order (RFO) seeking division of the pension plan. Given that this is a post-judgment request, the RFO and all other required documents were personally served on December 26th, however, the original Proof of Service states that service was on December 26, 2026, not December 26, 2025. Respondent has not filed a Responsive Declaration to Request for Order. Petitioner was ordered to correct the Proof of Service and the matter was continued to the present date.
A corrected Proof of Service was filed on March 10, 2026, indicating personal service of all required documents on December 16, 2025.
On May 12, 2025, Petitioner filed a Supplemental Declaration and a Declaration of Callie B. Cambridge in Support of Petitioner’s Request for Attorney Fees and Costs. Both documents were mail served on May 12th.
Petitioner is requesting equal division of community interest in Respondent’s Operating Engineers Pension Plan (OE3) at shared costs. She further requests attorney’s fees and costs pursuant to Family Code § 2556, 2032, and Civil Procedure § 128.5.
Respondent filed a Responsive Declaration to Request for Order on May 15, 2026. It was not served until May 18th. The court finds this to be late filed pursuant to Civil Procedure section 1005(b) which states all opposition papers are to be filed at least nine court days before the hearing date. Section 12c states, “[w]here any law requires an act to be performed no later than a specified number of days before a hearing date, the last day to perform that act shall be determined by counting backward from the hearing date, excluding the day of the hearing as provided by Section 12.” Cal. Civ. Pro. § 12c. Section 1005(b) in conjunction with Section 12c would have made May 8th the last day for filing of the responsive declaration therefore, it is late filed and has not been read or considered by the court.
A joinder for the pension plan has been filed but it does not appear that the Summons and joinder documents have been served.
Petitioner’s request for equal division of the OE3 pension plan is granted. The parties are ordered to equally share in the costs of preparing the QDRO. Respondent is ordered to provide all necessary information to facilitate the preparation of the QDRO no later than June 21, 2026.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DEPARTMENT 5 May 21, 2026 8:30 AM/1:30 PM
Petitioner’s request for attorney’s fees pursuant to Family Code § 2032 is denied due to her failure to file an Income and Expense Declaration. In the face of a request for attorney’s fees and costs under Family Code § 2030 and 2032, the court is to make findings on “whether there is a disparity in access to funds to retain counsel, and whether one party is able to pay for legal representation of both parties.” Fam. Code § 2030(a)(2). Without the filing of an Income and Expense Declaration by the moving party the court is unable to make the requisite findings and therefore the request is denied.
The request for sanctions pursuant to Civil Procedure § 128.5 is likewise denied as it is procedurally improper. A motion for sanctions under § 128.5 “...shall be made separately from other motions or requests and shall describe the specific alleged action or tactic, made in bad faith, that is frivolous or solely intended to cause unnecessary delay.” Cal. Civ. Pro. § 128.5(f)(1)(A).
Petitioner is directed to prepare the Findings and Orders After Hearing (FOAH); however, this order is effective immediately upon the court’s adoption of the tentative ruling and is not conditioned on the preparation of the FOAH.
TENTATIVE RULING #4: PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR EQUAL DIVISION OF THE OE3 PENSION PLAN IS GRANTED. THE PARTIES ARE ORDERED TO EQUALLY SHARE IN THE COSTS OF PREPARING THE QDRO. RESPONDENT IS ORDERED TO PROVIDE ALL NECESSARY INFORMATION TO FACILITATE THE PREPARATION OF THE QDRO NO LATER THAN JUNE 21, 2026. THE REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO CIVIL PROCEDURE § 128.5 IS LIKEWISE DENIED AS IT IS PROCEDURALLY IMPROPER.
PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES PURSUANT TO FAMILY CODE § 2032 IS DENIED DUE TO HER FAILURE TO FILE AN INCOME AND EXPENSE DECLARATION.
PETITIONER IS DIRECTED TO PREPARE THE FINDINGS AND ORDERS AFTER HEARING (FOAH); HOWEVER, THIS ORDER IS EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY UPON THE COURT’S ADOPTION OF THE TENTATIVE RULING AND IS NOT CONDITIONED ON THE PREPARATION OF THE FOAH.
NO HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD UNLESS A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT IS TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH THE COURT’S WEBSITE OR BY PHONE CALL TO THE COURT AT (530) 621-6725 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07; SEE ALSO LEWIS V. SUPERIOR COURT, 19 CAL.4TH 1232, 1247 (1999). NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF
LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DEPARTMENT 5 May 21, 2026 8:30 AM/1:30 PM
A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT AND THE GROUNDS UPON WHICH ARGUMENT IS BEING REQUESTED MUST BE MADE BY PHONE CALL OR IN PERSON BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07.