DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD26681255·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing 3 months agoTentative ruling to be posted

THE JOHN STEWART COMPANY VS. ELLIOT HOLLINGSWORTH ET AL

Notice Of Motion To Compel Defendants Pladee Tommy Clayton'S And Georgina Marie Jenkins' Responses To Plaintiff'S Form Interrogatories - General, Set Two, Plaintiff'S Request For Production Of Documents, Set Two, To Deem Facts Admitted And Request For Sanctions Against Defendants Pladee Tommy Clayton And Georgina Marie Jenkins In The Amount Of $585.00

Hearing date
May 26, 2026
Department
501
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$585.00

Parties

PlaintiffTHE JOHN STEWART COMPANY
DefendantELLIOT HOLLINGSWORTH
DefendantPladee Tommy Clayton
DefendantGeorgina Marie Jenkins

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD26681255 - May 26, 2026 Hearing date: May 26, 2026 Case number: CUD26681255 Case title: THE JOHN STEWART COMPANY VS. ELLIOT HOLLINGSWORTH ET AL Case Number: | | CUD26681255 | Case Title: | | THE JOHN STEWART COMPANY VS. ELLIOT HOLLINGSWORTH ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-05-26 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion To Compel Defendants Pladee Tommy Clayton'S And Georgina Marie Jenkins' Responses To Plaintiff'S Form Interrogatories - General, Set Two, Plaintiff'S Request For Production Of Documents, Set Two, To Deem Facts Admitted And Request For Sanctions Against Defendants Pladee Tommy Clayton And Georgina Marie Jenkins In The Amount Of $585.00 | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for May 26, 2026.

Line 6.1. PLAINTIFF THE JOHN STEWART COMPANY Motion To Compel Defendants Pladee Tommy Clayton'S And Georgina Marie Jenkins' Responses To Plaintiff'S Form Interrogatories - General, Set Two, Plaintiff'S Request For Production Of Documents, Set Two, To Deem Facts Admitted And Request For Sanctions Against Defendants Pladee Tommy Clayton And Georgina Marie Jenkins In The Amount Of $585.00 Tentative ruling to be posted-PLS CHECK BACK AT 3PM =(501/DWH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share