Velocity Investments, LLC vs. Villegas

methods prescribed by statute, including facts demonstrating why each method was unsuccessful at every address or location where the defendant is likely to be found.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 413.30, subd. (a)(2).) See declarations of plaintiff Kim, process server Hernandez and investigator Candias.

Plaintiffs may serve the summons and amended complaint, along with a copy of this order, on the California Secretary of State. Service shall be completed within 30 days after delivery to the Secretary of State. Ca. Corp. Code section 17701.16.

The Court finds this motion (ROA 63) and the one set for May 29, 2026, (ROA 66) are virtually IDENTICAL. Based on the ruling on this motion (ROA 63), the Court now takes the motion set on May 29, 2026, (ROA 66) OFF CALENDAR.

The Case Management Conference is CONTINUED to December 17, 2026, at 9:30 a.m. in Department C12.

Clerk to give notice.

8. Velocity Investments, LLC vs. Villegas

24-01433786

1. Motion to Quash (Service of Summons) 2. Case Management Conference

Defendant Frank Villegas’s Motion to Quash Service of Summons and the Case Management Conference were both CONTINUED to August 7, 2026, at 9:30 a.m. in Department C12.

9. M&Y Personal Injury Lawyers vs. Solution Law APC

25-01517436

1. Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 2. Case Management Conference

Defendant Solution Law, APC’s motion for judgment on the pleadings is DENIED. (Code Civ. Proc., § 438 [authorizing motion].)

1st cause of action: common counts.

This cause of action states sufficient facts to allege a common count for money had and received. (Farmers Ins. Exchange v. Zerin (1997) 53 Cal.App.4th 445, 460 [“A cause of action for money had and received is stated if it is alleged the defendant ‘is indebted to the plaintiff in a certain sum ‘for money had and received by the defendant for the use of the plaintiff’”];