Computacenter United States, Inc. v. AFCOM Technologies, Inc.

Case: Computacenter United States, Inc. v. AFCOM Technologies, Inc. Case No. CV2026-0867 Hearing Date: May 21, 2026 Department Thirteen 9:00 a.m.

Application for pro hac vice admission of Michelle K. Stacko:

Plaintiff Computacenter United States Inc.’s application for pro hac vice admission of Michelle K. Stacko is GRANTED. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 9.40; Stacko decl., ¶¶ 2-10; Murtagh decl., ¶ 5.)

The notice of motion does not provide notice of this Court’s tentative ruling system as required by Local Rule 11.2(b). Counsel for moving party, or the moving party if unrepresented by counsel, is ordered to notify the opposing party or parties immediately of the tentative ruling system.

If no hearing is requested, and no party appears at the hearing, this tentative ruling is effective immediately. No formal order pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312 or further notice is required.

Application for pro hac vice admission of Samuel A. Hornak:

Plaintiff Computacenter United States Inc.’s application for pro hac vice admission of Samuel A. Hornak is GRANTED. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 9.40; Hornak decl., ¶¶ 2-10; Murtagh decl., ¶ 5.)

The notice of motion does not provide notice of this Court’s tentative ruling system as required by Local Rule 11.2(b). Counsel for moving party, or the moving party if unrepresented by counsel, is ordered to notify the opposing party or parties immediately of the tentative ruling system.

If no hearing is requested, and no party appears at the hearing, this tentative ruling is effective immediately. No formal order pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312 or further notice is required.

3 of 6