| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class/PAGA Settlement
113 Lopez vs. Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class/PAGA Settlement Quick Crete Products Corp The court has reviewed and considered the papers, including the supplemental papers, filed in support of plaintiff’s motion for 2023- preliminary approval of a $850,000 class action and PAGA 01355638 settlement. The motion will be granted as follows:
$10,000 for plaintiff’s enhancement payment (not to exceed);
$283,333.33 for attorneys’ fees (not to exceed);
$27,000 for litigation costs (not to exceed);
$11,000 for settlement administration costs (not to exceed); and
$60,000 total PAGA penalties ($45,000 to LWDA).
The final approval hearing is scheduled for October 15, 2026 at 2:00 p.m. in Department CX102. The motion for final approval shall be filed at least 16 court days before the hearing.
Plaintiff is ordered to give notice, including to the LWDA, and to file a proof of service.
114 Molle vs. Clear Motion for Final Approval of Class/PAGA Settlement Vision Financial, LLC The Court has reviewed the supplemental materials provided by Plaintiffs’ Counsel and finds that they adequately address the 2024- previously identified issues. Accordingly, Plaintiffs Uriah Molle 01433193 and Amin Asvadi’s Motion for Approval of PAGA Settlement is GRANTED.
This is a PAGA-only action.
On 10/15/2024, Plaintiffs Uriah Molle and Amin Asvadi, both individually and on behalf of all similarly situated aggrieved employees, filed a PAGA complaint against Defendant Clear Vision Financial, LLC d/b/a Liberty Financial, alleging a single cause of action for PAGA penalties. (ROA #2.) Defendant answered on 12/19/2024. (ROA #12.)
On 10/2/2025, Plaintiffs filed the instant Motion for Approval of PAGA Settlement, and submitted for the Court’s review the Settlement Agreement and Release of Private Attorneys General Act Claims and proposed notice/cover letter to aggrieved employees that will accompany the payments to them. The motion seeks approval of the parties’ proposed settlement of Plaintiffs’ PAGA claims for the non-reversionary gross settlement amount (GSA) of $165,000.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”