NORTHSTAR VILLAGE ASSOC. v. CLP NORTHSTAR

PLACER COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT THURSDAY, CIVIL LAW AND MOTION DEPARTMENT 3 THE HONORABLE MICHAEL W. JONES TENTATIVE RULINGS FOR MAY 21, 2026, AT 8:30 A.M.

7. S-CV-0047732 NORTHSTAR VILLAGE ASSOC. v. CLP NORTHSTAR

Case Management Conference

The case management conference is continued to August 20, 2026, at 8:30 a.m. in Department 3. A review of the court record reflects no proposed order for the parties’ stipulated stay has been filed with the court despite the parties’ indications a further stay may be requested.

8. S-CV-0051706 NERSESYAN, OVSEP v. JUERN, JEREMY

Defendant Jeremy S. Juern M.D.’s Motion for Summary Judgment

Preliminary Matters

Defendant’s requests for judicial notice are granted.

Ruling on Motion

Defendant moves for summary judgment or, in the alternative, summary adjudication as to plaintiff’s complaint. A motion for summary judgment may be granted if “all the papers submitted show that there is no triable issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” (Code Civ. Proc. § 437c, subd. (c).)

This is compared to summary adjudication that requires a showing that there is no merit to one or more of the causes of action. (Id. at § 437c, subd. (f)(1).) A motion for summary adjudication proceeds “in all procedural respects as a motion for summary judgment.” (Id. at § 437c, subd. (f)(2).)

In reviewing either motion, the trial court must view the supporting evidence, and inferences reasonably drawn from such evidence, in the light most favorable to the opposing party. (Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Company (2001) 25 Cal.4th 826, 843.)

Defendant, as the moving party, bears the initial burden of establishing that “one or more elements of the cause of action, even if not separately pleaded, cannot be established, or that there is a complete defense to the cause of action.” (Code Civ. Proc. § 473c