JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Mojarro

Case: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Mojarro Case No. CV2025-1814 Hearing Date: May 20, 2026 Department Fourteen 9:00 a.m.

Plaintiff JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.’s unopposed motion to vacate dismissal and enter judgment under terms of stipulated settlement is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (Code Civ. Proc., § 664.6.) Based on defendant Rebecca R. Mojarro’s answer filed on September 16, 2025, she is represented by counsel. Plaintiff did not serve this motion on defendant’s counsel. (Cal. Rules of Court, rules 1.21(a) [“Whenever a document is required to be served on a party, the service must be made on the party's attorney if the party is represented”], 2.251(c); YCR 7.2; see also Code Civ. Proc., §§ 1005, subd. (b), 1010.6.)

The notice of motion provides notice of this Court’s tentative ruling system. However, the notice does not contain the required language pursuant to Local Rule 11.2(b) (as amended, eff. Jan. 1, 2021). Counsel for moving party, or the moving party if unrepresented by counsel, is ordered to notify the opposing party or parties immediately of the tentative ruling system.

If no hearing is requested, and no party appears at the hearing, this tentative ruling is effective immediately. No formal order pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312 or further notice is required.

3 of 3