DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
S-CV-0056330·placer·Civil·Civil
Hearing 3 months agoGRANTED

IN RE THE PETITION OF BURNS, MOLLY

Motion to Set Aside Order Recognizing Change of Gender and Sex Identifier

Hearing date
May 7, 2026
Department
3
Prevailing
Petitioner

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PetitionerBURNS, MOLLY

Ruling

PLACER COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT THURSDAY, CIVIL LAW AND MOTION DEPARTMENT 3 THE HONORABLE MICHAEL W. JONES TENTATIVE RULINGS FOR MAY 7, 2026, AT 8:30 A.M.

16. S-CV-0056330 IN RE THE PETITION OF BURNS, MOLLY

This matter has been reassigned by the Presiding Judge Jeffrey S. Penney to be heard by the Honorable Michael W. Jones.

Motion to Set Aside Order Recognizing Change of Gender and Sex Identifier

Petitioner’s motion to set aside order recognizing change of gender and sex identifier, issued by the court on December 29, 2025, is set aside based on petitioner’s mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect. (Code Civ. Proc., § 473, subd. (b).)

17. S-CV-0056898 IN RE THE PETITION OF WHITE BEAR, BRANDON

Petition for Approval of Minor’s Compromise Claim (Noa White Bear)

The petition for approval of minor’s compromise claim is granted. After careful consideration of the petition and attachments, the court finds the settlement is in the best interest of the minor. (Prob. Code, § 3500; Code Civ. Proc., § 372; Pearson v. Superior Court (2012) 202 Cal.App.4th 1333, 1337-38.)

Petition for Approval of Minor’s Compromise Claim (Willow White Bear)

The petition for approval of minor’s compromise claim is granted. After careful consideration of the petition and attachments, the court finds the settlement is in the best interest of the minor. (Prob. Code, § 3500; Code Civ. Proc., § 372; Pearson v. Superior Court (2012) 202 Cal.App.4th 1333, 1337-38.)

PLACER SUPERIOR COURT – DEPARTMENT 3 Thursday Civil Law and Motion – Tentative Rulings

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share