DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
S-CV-0056413·placer·Civil·Civil Harassment
Hearing 4 months agoGRANTED

Redick, Marybeth v. Rodriguez, Deonna

Motion for Attorney’s Fees

Hearing date
May 5, 2026
Department
40
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Attorney Fees rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$2,532

Parties

PlaintiffMarybeth Redick
DefendantDeonna Rodriguez

Ruling

16. S-CV-0056413 Redick, Marybeth v. Rodriguez, Deonna

This tentative ruling is issued by Commissioner Michael A. Jacques. If oral argument is requested, it will be heard on May 7, 2026, at 8:30 a.m. in Department 40 before Commissioner Michael A. Jacques.

Moving party is advised the notice of motion must include notice of the court’s tentative ruling procedures. (Local Rule 20.2.3(C).)

Motion for Attorney’s Fees

Respondent requests attorney’s fees as the prevailing party in a civil harassment restraining order proceeding.

Petitioner filed an untimely opposition, declaration, exhibits, and a supplemental declaration. In its discretion, the court considered her filing, to the extent the documents were relevant to the question of attorney’s fees.

Code of Civil Procedure section 527.6 (s) allows the prevailing party in a civil harassment restraining order action to be awarded court costs and attorney’s fees. (Code Civ. Proc., § 527.6 (s).) Petitioner opposes based on the merits of the case, which is not relevant to the question of attorney’s fees in a civil harassment restraining order proceeding. Ibid. Here, respondent was the prevailing party as the court denied petitioner’s request for a civil harassment restraining order after a hearing on the merits. Ibid.

Respondent requests attorney’s fees for over 9 hours of time spent litigating this case. (See Mot. Atty. Fees P&As.) A breakdown of time and work performed is included in the declaration submitted by respondent’s counsel, which reflects 13.80 hours expended. (See Hensley Decl. Attach. A.) Respondent’s counsel charges an hourly rate of $430.00 per hour. See id. The court finds that the figure of $2,532, the amount listed in the points and authorities filed concurrently with the motion, to be reasonable attorney’s fees and costs.

Accordingly, the court grants respondent’s motion for attorney’s fees and costs to respondent, as the prevailing party, and awards $2,532, the amount listed in the points and authorities filed concurrently with the motion.

18

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share