Langner, Karla v. Nolivo, Girolamo

3. S-CV-0049514 Liu, Ping v. The Original Mowbrays Tree Service

Motion to Compel Production of Documents by Plaintiff’s Expert Witness, Randall C. Epperson, PhD.

Defendant’s motion is granted, subject to the parties entering into a protective order protecting the confidentiality of the documents.

4. S-CV-0049572 Roe, Jane v. Doe 1

Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Discovery

Date reserved, but no motion filed.

5. S-CV-0050494 Beaubien, Nicole v. Cinemark

Motion to Compel IME

Appearance of the parties is required on May 1, 2026 at 2:00 p.m. in Department 33. Counsel are directed to be prepared to discuss dates that are available for the IME.

6. S-CV-0053651 Langner, Karla v. Nolivo, Girolamo

Defendant Allison James of California, Inc.’s Motion to Compel Responses to Special Interrogatories, Set One, Propounded by Defendant to Plaintiff Karla Langner

Interrogatory No. 1 – All objections are overruled. Plaintiff is to respond to this interrogatory.

Interrogatory No. 3 – All objections are overruled. Plaintiff is to respond to this interrogatory.

Interrogatory No. 4 – All objections are overruled. Plaintiff is to respond to this interrogatory.

Interrogatory No. 6 – All objections are overruled. Plaintiff is to respond to this interrogatory.

Interrogatory No. 7 – All objections are overruled. Plaintiff is to respond to this interrogatory.

Interrogatory No. 9 – All objections are overruled. Plaintiff is to respond to this interrogatory.

Interrogatory No. 10 – All objections are overruled. Plaintiff is to respond to this interrogatory.

Interrogatory No. 12 – All objections are overruled. Plaintiff is to respond to this interrogatory.

Interrogatory No. 13 – All objections are overruled. Plaintiff is to respond to this interrogatory.

Interrogatory No. 15 – All objections are overruled. Plaintiff is to respond to this interrogatory.

Interrogatory No. 16 – All objections are overruled. Plaintiff is to respond to this interrogatory.

Interrogatory No. 18 – All objections are overruled. Plaintiff is to respond to this interrogatory.

Plaintiff is to provide responses no later than June 1, 2026.

Defendant Allison James of California, Inc.’s request for monetary sanctions against plaintiff is granted in the amount of $1,710. Such sanctions shall be paid no later than June 1, 2026. Defendant Allison James of California, Inc.’s request for monetary sanctions against plaintiff’s counsel is denied.

Defendant Allison James of California, Inc.s’ Motion to Compel Responses to Request for Production of Documents, Set One, Propounded by Defendant to Plaintiff Karla Langner

Request For Production No. 1 – All objections are overruled. Plaintiff is to respond and comply with the request.

Request For Production No. 2 – All objections are overruled. Plaintiff is to respond and comply with the request.

Request For Production No. 3 – All objections are overruled. Plaintiff is to respond and comply with the request.

Request For Production No. 4 – All objections are overruled. Plaintiff is to respond and comply with the request.

Request For Production No. 5 – All objections are overruled. Plaintiff is to respond and comply with the request.

Request For Production No. 6 – All objections are overruled. Plaintiff is to respond and comply with the request.

Plaintiff is to provide responses and documents no later than June 1, 2026.

Defendant Allison James of California, Inc.’s request for monetary sanctions against plaintiff is granted in the amount of $1,010. Such sanctions shall be paid no later than June 1, 2026. Defendant Allison James of California, Inc.’s request for monetary sanctions against plaintiff’s counsel is denied.

Defendant Allison James of California, Inc.s’ Motion to Compel Responses to Request for Admission, Set One, Propounded by Defendant to Plaintiff Karla Langner

Attached to plaintiff’s response are supplemental responses. The parties have not had a meet and confer on those supplemental responses.

Appearance of the parties is required on May 1, 2026, at 2:00 p.m. in Department 33.

Defendant Allison James of California, Inc.s’ Motion to Compel Responses to Form Interrogatories, Set One, Propounded by Defendant to Plaintiff Karla Langner

Attached to plaintiff’s response are supplemental responses. The parties have not had a meet and confer on those supplemental responses.

Appearance of the parties is required on May 1, 2026, at 2:00 p.m. in Department 33.

7. S-CV-0053853 Francisco Benavidez v. John Mourier Construction

Defendant’s Motion to Compel Deposition

Appearance of the parties is required on May 1, 2026 at 2:00 p.m. in Department 33. Counsel are directed to be prepared to discuss dates that are available for the subject deposition.