| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
Motion to enforce settlement
PLACER COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL LAW AND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS TUESDAY, APRIL 28, 2026
These are the tentative rulings for civil law and motion matters set at 8:30 a.m. on Tuesday, April 28, 2026. The tentative ruling will be the court’s final ruling unless notice of appearance and request for oral argument are given to all parties and the court by 4:00 p.m., Monday, April 27, 2026. Notice of request for oral argument to the court must be made by calling (916) 408-6481. Requests for oral argument made by any other method will not be accepted. Prevailing parties are required to submit orders after hearing to the court within 10 court days of the scheduled hearing date, and after approval as to form by opposing counsel. Court reporters are not provided by the court. Parties may provide a court reporter at their own expense.
Except as otherwise noted, these tentative rulings are issued by the HONORABLE TRISHA J. HIRASHIMA and if oral argument is requested, it will be heard at 8:30 a.m. in Department 42, located at 10820 Justice Center Drive, Roseville, California 95678.
PLEASE NOTE: REMOTE APPEARANCES ARE STRONGLY ENCOURAGED FOR ALL CIVIL LAW AND MOTION MATTERS. (Local Rule 10.24.) More information is available at the court’s website: www.placer.courts.ca.gov.
1. M-CV-0084551 Discover Bank v. Stojkovich, Trisha
Motion for Plaintiff’s Application to Change Plaintiff Name Due to Plaintiff Merger
Plaintiff requests to amend its name to Capital One, N.A., as successor by merger to Discover Bank. Defendant has been properly served with the summons and complaint. Judgment was previously entered in favor of plaintiff. The court grants plaintiff’s unopposed motion to change plaintiff name due to plaintiff merger. Plaintiff’s name is amended to Capital One, N.A., successor by merger to Discover Bank.
2. M-CV-0086045 Bank of America v. Fisk, Tracy Michelle
The motion to enforce settlement is dropped from calendar as no moving papers were filed with the court.
3. M-CV-0093785 Ryad, Fatima Zahra v. El Massioui, Ben
Plaintiff’s Motion for Reclassification and for Leave to Amend
Plaintiff moves to reclassify from unlawful detainer limited less than $10,000 to unlimited civil and for leave to amend the first amended complaint. Defendant opposed
1
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”