DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25678577·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing about 1 year agoGRANTED

935 KEARNY STREET, LLC VS. MIKLOS BROWN ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion For Order That The Truth Of Matters Be Deemed Admitted

Hearing date
Jul 3, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

Plaintiff935 KEARNY STREET, LLC
DefendantMIKLOS BROWN

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25678577 - July 3, 2025 Hearing date: July 3, 2025 Case number: CUD25678577 Case title: 935 KEARNY STREET, LLC VS. MIKLOS BROWN ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25678577 | Case Title: | | 935 KEARNY STREET, LLC VS. MIKLOS BROWN ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-07-03 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion For Order That The Truth Of Matters Be Deemed Admitted | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for July 3, 2025 line 9.

PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ORDER THAT THE TRUTH OF MATTERS BE DEEMED ADMITTED is GRANTED, subject to opposition. Truth of all matters in Plaintiff's Requests for Admissions, Set One to Defendant Miklos Brown, served on June 4, 2025, are deemed admitted. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom [Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252].

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share