DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25677744·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing about 1 year agoCONTINUED

SF MULTIFAMILY POOLS 2-3 (B) OWNER LLC VS. LAWRENCE THOMAS ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion For Order To Substitute Plaintiff

Hearing date
Jun 11, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jun 18, 2025

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffSF MULTIFAMILY POOLS 2-3 (B) OWNER LLC
DefendantLAWRENCE THOMAS

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for June 11, 2025. Line 8. PLAINTIFF SF MULTIFAMILY POOLS 2-3 (B) OWNER LLC Notice Of Motion And Motion For Order To Substitute Plaintiff is CONTINUED to June 18, 2025 at 9:30 a.m., for the moving party to comply with LRSF 2.7B and provide courtesy copies of the opposition papers no later than June 12, 2025, with a cover letter reflecting the new hearing date. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share