DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25677629·sf·Civil·Real Property / Housing
Hearing about 1 year agoGRANTED

BENNY K. CHEUNG VS. DEAVON MALONE ET AL

MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD

Hearing date
Jun 24, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffBENNY K. CHEUNG
DefendantDEAVON MALONE ET AL

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25677629 - June 24, 2025 Hearing date: June 24, 2025 Case number: CUD25677629 Case title: BENNY K. CHEUNG VS. DEAVON MALONE ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25677629 | Case Title: | | BENNY K. CHEUNG VS. DEAVON MALONE ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-06-24 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion calendar for June 24, 2025, line 8. Defendant's Counsel's Motion for Withdrawal of Attorney of Record is GRANTED.

No opposition filed. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tent ative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share