TAYLOR DIXON VS. OLUSOJI A. FANOIKI
Notice Of Motion And Motion For Relief Under Ccp 473(B)
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD23672707 - June 27, 2025 Hearing date: June 27, 2025 Case number: CUD23672707 Case title: TAYLOR DIXON VS. OLUSOJI A. FANOIKI Case Number: | | CUD23672707 | Case Title: | | TAYLOR DIXON VS. OLUSOJI A. FANOIKI | Court Date: | | 2025-06-27 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion For Relief Under Ccp 473(B) | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion calendar for June 27, 2025, line 9.
Defendant's Motion for Relief Under CCP 473(b) is MOOT. Defendant requests relief from the Court's order striking his opposition in connection with his May 23, 2025 motion. The opposition which was stricken was that of the plaintiff, not the defendant. Defendant was not the opposing party. The Court did not strike defendant's reply. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tent ative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”