DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC24616765·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing about 1 year agoCONTINUED

JUN KWOCK TOM VS. FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE CO., ET AL

Amended Notice Of Motion And Motion For Reconsideration Of Hon. Charles F. Haines' April 23, 2025 Orders Dismissing Action

Hearing date
Jun 9, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jun 13, 2025

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Reconsideration rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffJUN KWOCK TOM
DefendantFIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE CO.

Attorneys

Wendy H. Chaufor Plaintiff

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for June 9, 2025. Line 2. PLAINTIFF JUN TOM Amended Notice Of Motion And Motion For Reconsideration Of Hon. Charles F. Haines' April 23, 2025 Orders Dismissing Action is CONTINUED to June 13, 2025 at 9:30 a.m., to be heard with other pending motions. =(501/VMH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share