DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC24612227·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing about 1 year agoOVERRULED

HONG ZHENG ET AL VS. GLENN FAMA ET AL

Amended DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Jun 27, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Parties

PlaintiffHONG ZHENG
DefendantGLENN FAMA

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC24612227 - June 27, 2025 Hearing date: June 27, 2025 Case number: CGC24612227 Case title: HONG ZHENG ET AL VS. GLENN FAMA ET AL Case Number: | | CGC24612227 | Case Title: | | HONG ZHENG ET AL VS. GLENN FAMA ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-06-27 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Amended DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion calendar for June 27, 2025, line 3.

Defendants' Amended Demurrer to Amended Complaint is OVERRULED. Both causes of action are sufficiently plead. The 'extreme and outrageous conduct' element is met because the FAC alleges a plausible theory as to why Defendants' statement to "go back home" had xenophobic intent followed by a three-year campaign of surveillance, trespasses, and false and/or negligent statements and rumors. Additionally, the facts are sufficient to state an NIED claim because Plaintiffs are foreseeable victims of Defendants' aforementioned conduct and because the FAC alleges physical symptoms of emotional distress, including stomach pain, headaches, asthmatic reactions. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tent ative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share