DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC24611749·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing about 1 year agoCONTINUED

2565 MISSION STREET LLC VS. QUALIA ENTERTAINMENT, INC. ET AL

Notice Of Application And Hearing For Right To Attach Order And Order For Issuance Of Writ Of Attachment

Hearing date
Jul 1, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jul 18, 2025

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

Plaintiff2565 MISSION STREET LLC
DefendantQUALIA ENTERTAINMENT, INC. ET AL

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC24611749 - July 1, 2025 Hearing date: July 1, 2025 Case number: CGC24611749 Case title: 2565 MISSION STREET LLC VS. QUALIA ENTERTAINMENT, INC. ET AL Case Number: | | CGC24611749 | Case Title: | | 2565 MISSION STREET LLC VS. QUALIA ENTERTAINMENT, INC. ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-07-01 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Application And Hearing For Right To Attach Order And Order For Issuance Of Writ Of Attachment | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for July 1, 2025 line 3.

PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION AND HEARING FOR RIGHT TO ATTACH ORDER AND ORDER FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OF ATTACHMENT is CONTINUED to July 18, 2025 at 9:30 a.m., for the opposing party to comply with SFLR 2.7B and provide courtesy copies of the opposition papers no later than July 2, 2025 by 9:00 a.m. with a cover letter reflecting new hearing date. (Moving papers received) =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom [Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252].

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share