| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
MOTION TO STRIKE Amended COMPLAINT
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC23611061 - July 16, 2025 Hearing date: July 16, 2025 Case number: CGC23611061 Case title: JISOO YOO ET AL VS. POST-MONTGOMERY ASSOCIATES, A CALIFORNAIA GENERAL ET AL Case Number: | | CGC23611061 | Case Title: | | JISOO YOO ET AL VS. POST-MONTGOMERY ASSOCIATES, A CALIFORNAIA GENERAL ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-07-16 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION TO STRIKE Amended COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion calendar for July 16, 2025, line 2.
Motion to Strike Amended Complaint is GRANTED. Punitive damages are stricken from the complaint. (Paragraphs 33, 38, and item 4 in the Prayer.) None of the wrongful acts alleged in the First Amended Complaint is, on its face, oppressive, malicious or fraudulent. These include: preparing the building for renovations by moving out tenants, inflating CAM charges, failing to maintain the building's common areas, failing to promote the Galleria and its tenants' businesses, and "using false gross sales figures." =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tent ative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”