DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC19579883·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing about 1 year agoGRANTED IN PART

FOLSOM STREET INVESTMENTS, LLC ET AL VS. MICHAEL B. ROTHENBERG ET AL

MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

Hearing date
Jun 2, 2025
Department
501
Judge
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Parties

PlaintiffFolsom Street Investments, LLC
PlaintiffCraig Hordlow
DefendantMichael B. Rothenberg
DefendantRothenberg Ventures LLC

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for June 2, 2025 line 6. PLAINTIFF FOLSOM STREET INVESTMENTS, LLC A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, CRAIG HORDLOW MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS is GRANTED IN PART.

Judgment shall be entered resolving all claims filed by plaintiffs Folsom Street Investments, LLC and Mr. Horlow against defendant Rothenberg Ventures LLC stating that, after payment made by Rothenberg Ventures during the pendency of the case, plaintiffs are not entitled to any damages or other pre-judgment relief against Rothenberg Ventures on plaintiffs' sole remaining claim for breach of contract. The judgment shall also state that both plaintiffs and Rothenberg Ventures may, if they wish, make a post-judgment motion for contract attorney's fees per Civil Code 1717(b)(1).

Paragraph 50 of the second amended complaint filed August 24, 2022, the operative complaint, paragraph 50 of Rothenberg Ventures' answer to the second amended complaint, and the February 14, 2025 entry of the dismissal of the second cause of action for fraud against Rothenberg Ventures establishes that there are no remaining pre-judgment claims or issues to be adjudicated and thus entry of judgment as between plaintiffs and Rothenberg Ventures is appropriate at this time.

This determination is fully consistent with, if not mandated by, the order filed April 9, 2025 that "the only matter remaining in this case as to Rothenberg Ventures" is entitlement to attorney's fees under the Note. As recognized in the April 9, 2025 order, the determination of who is the prevailing party for an award of attorney's fees and the amount of any fees to be awarded may not be made until judgment is entered. Once judgment is entered, the parties may then file motions seeking to be declared a prevailing party and for an award of fees per Civil Code 1717(b)(1).

=(501/HEK) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share