DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC24613430·sf·Civil·Discovery Dispute
Hearing about 1 year agoGRANTED

ADRIANA CABRERA MARQUEZ ET AL VS. WILLIAM H. WELLMAN ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion To Compel The Deposition Of Defendant Pitchaw Thongkom And Request For Monetary Sanctions

Hearing date
Jul 7, 2025
Department
302
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$2,955.85

Parties

PlaintiffADRIANA CABRERA MARQUEZ
PlaintiffMARIA CABRERA
PlaintiffVICTORIANO BRICIO
DefendantWILLIAM H. WELLMAN
DefendantPITCHAW THONGKOM

Ruling

Matter on calendar for Monday, July 7, 2025, Line 2, PLAINTIFF ADRIANA MARQUEZ, MARIA CABRERA, VICTORIANO BRICIO's Motion To Compel The Deposition Of Defendant Pitchaw Thongkom And Request For Monetary Sanctions.

Plaintiffs' motion to compel the deposition of Defendant Pitchaw Thongkom is GRANTED. There is a liberal policy in favor of discovery and inquiry may be made into "any matter, not privileged, that is relevant to the subject matter... if the matter either is itself admissible in evidence or appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence." (CCP 2017.010.) Defendant did not object to the deposition notice and his failure to appear was without substantial justification. Defendant Pitchaw Thongkom shall appear for deposition on the agreed-upon date of July 31, 2025. In addition, defendant Pitchaw Thongkom shall pay $2,955.85 in sanctions to Plaintiffs by July 31, 2025, since his conduct lacked substantial justification.

For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 302 Zoom ID 160 409 7690; Passcode 516287.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.

Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing. Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.

The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/JMQ). | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share