CARRIE MYLES VS. URBAN ALCHEMY ET AL
Case Information
Motion(s)
Notice Of Second Motion And Second Motion For An Order (1) Compelling Further Responses To Defendant'S Supplemental Interrogatory Responses (Set 1), Specifically Special Interrogatory 4, Pursuant To C.C.P Section 2030.300 Or, In The Alternative To Compelling Further Responses, (2) Request For Evidentiary Sanctions Pursuant To C.C.P Section 2030.300; And (3) Request For Monetary Sanctions For Attorney Fees And Costs In The Amount Of $5,939.56
Motion Type Tags
Motion to Compel Further Responses · Motion for Sanctions
Parties
- Plaintiff: CARRIE MYLES
- Defendant: URBAN ALCHEMY
Ruling
Matter on the LAW & MOTION/DISCOVERY CALENDAR for Monday, Jun-23-2025, LINE 4. PLAINTIFF CARRIE MYLES' Second Motion For An Order (1) Compelling Further Responses To Defendant'S Supplemental Interrogatory Responses (Set 1), Specifically Special Interrogatory 4, Pursuant To C.C.P Section 2030.300 Or, In The Alternative To Compelling Further Responses, (2) Request For Evidentiary Sanctions Pursuant To C.C.P Section 2030.300; And (3) Request For Monetary Sanctions For Attorney Fees And Costs In The Amount Of $5,939.56 Pursuant To C.C.P Section 2030.300 Jointly And Severally Against Defendant And Its Counsel.
Plaintiff Carrie Myules' second motion for further responses to special interrogatory 4 and for evidentiary and monetary sanctions is denied in its entirety. Defendant Urban Alchemy's request for sanctions is also denied. The portion of the motion seeking to compel further responses and for evidentiary sanctions is denied as moot since Urban Alchemy has fully responded to interrogatory 4 and also produced all of Ms. Wear's notes of her investigation. Both sides' requests for monetary sanctions are denied since both sides acted with substantial justification as to the matters relating to this motion.
For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 302 Zoom ID 160 409 7690; Passcode 516287.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.
Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.
Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.
The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/HEK) | |