DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC24612458·sf·Civil·Discovery Dispute
Hearing about 1 year agoGRANTED

PAUL HENRY VS. ERIC YOUNG ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion To Compel Responses To Form Interrogatories, Set Two

Hearing date
Jul 17, 2025
Department
302
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$1,087.50

Parties

PlaintiffPaul Henry
DefendantEric Young
DefendantEmmanuel Kampouris

Attorneys

Kelly M. Petersonfor Defendant

Ruling

Set for Law and Motion/Discovery Calendar on Thursday, July 17, 2025, Line 9. 2 - DEFENDANT EMMANUEL KAMPOURIS' Motion To Compel Responses To Form Interrogatories, Set Two.

Defendant Emmanuel Kampouris's motion to compel response to form interrogatories, set two, is GRANTED.

Defendant served his second set of form interrogatories on May 5, 2025. Accounting for e-service, the deadline to respond fell on June 6, 2025. (CCP 2030.260; CCP 1010.6.) Plaintiff failed to timely provide any responses. Plaintiff belatedly served his original responses consisting of objections on June 16, 2025. By then, his objections were waived under CCP 2030.290. Plaintiff's waived objections did not amount to any response, and thus no meet and confer was required. (Leach v. Superior Court (1980) 111 Cal.App.3d 902, 905.) Where no responses are received, no meet and confer is required and no separate statement is required. Plaintiff must provide Code-compliant, objection free responses to Kampouris's form interrogatories, set two by July 30, 2025.

Plaintiff lacked substantial justification in opposing this motion. The court orders Plaintiff and his counsel, jointly and severally, to pay Kampouris $1,087.50 in sanctions by August 14, 2025.

For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 302 Zoom ID 160 409 7690; Passcode 516287.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.

Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.

Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.

The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/JMQ) | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share