DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC23605138·sf·Civil·Civil
Hearing about 1 year agoDENIED

QOINS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. VS. BOND FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Application To File Motion Under Seal

Hearing date
Jul 9, 2025
Department
302
Judge
Prevailing
Opposing Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffQOINS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
DefendantBOND FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Ruling

Set for Law and Motion/Discovery Calendar on Wednesday, July 09, 2025, Line 4. PLAINTIFF QOINS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'s Application To File Motion Under Seal.

Judgment Creditor Qoins Technologies, Inc.'s application to file motion under seal is denied. In order for a California trial court to issue a sealing order, the court must expressly find, among other things, that "A substantial probability exists that the overriding interest will be prejudiced if the record is not sealed;" "The proposed sealing is narrowly tailored;" and "No less restrictive means exist to achieve the overriding interest. (CRC 2.550(d).

Even assuming that Qoins has identified an overriding interest that supports sealing, Qoins' application, based solely on an attorney declaration, provides only conclusions as to the quoted matters that the court must find.(CRC 2.551 (b)(1) (The sealing "application must be accompanied by a memorandum and a declaration containing facts sufficient to justify the sealing.")). The pertinent sentence in the declaration is "Giving notice of Qoins' discovery would only permit Bond to carry out this fraudulent scheme further." Why? By whom? How so? How do you know? These and possibly other key questions are left unanswered.

For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 302 Zoom ID 160 409 7690; Passcode 516287.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.

Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.

Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.

The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/HEK) | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share