LORAN SIMON VS. TODD BRABEC ET AL
Case Information
Motion(s)
Notice And Motion To Compel Defendant 426 Fillmore Associations Further Amended Discovery Responses To Plaintiffs Request For Production Of Documents, Set No. Two, And Request For Sanctions
Motion Type Tags
Motion to Compel Further Responses · Motion for Sanctions
Parties
- Plaintiff: Loran Simon
- Defendant: Todd Brabec
- Defendant: 426 Fillmore Associations
Ruling
Set for Law and Motion/Discovery on Tuesday, June 10, 2025 Line 3, PLAINTIFF LORAN SIMON's Motion To Compel Defendant 426 Fillmore Associations Further Amended Discovery Responses To Plaintiffs Request For Production Of Documents, Set No. Two, And Request For Sanctions.
Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Defendant 426 Fillmore Association's ("HOA") Further Amended Discovery Responses to Plaintiff's Request For Production of Documents, Set No. Two, And Request For Sanctions is GRANTED. The requests at issue are reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and there is good cause to warrant further production. (CCP Section 2017.010; CCP 2031.010(b)(1).)
Plaintiff has shown that the HOA's responses are incomplete. HOA has not demonstrated that any objection has merit. Plaintiff's meet and confer was reasonable. The HOA is required to provide further verified code-compliant responses to requests for production 1-13. For any responses to which HOA is claiming a privilege, HOA shall produce a privilege log. Further responses and privilege log due no later than 10 court days from notice of this order.
The cited sections of the Davis Sterling Act are inapposite to this discovery dispute. HOA did not act with substantial justification. HOA shall pay $568.58 to pro per plaintiff as reasonable expenses per Kravitz v. Superior Court (2011) 91 Cal.App.4 th 1015, 1021, payment no later than 10 court days from notice of this order.
For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 302 Zoom ID 160 409 7690; Passcode 516287.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.
Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.
Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.
The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/HEK) |