DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CPF25519115·sf·Civil·Petition to Compel Arbitration
Hearing about 1 year agoGRANTED

JAYSON ALPON VS. BLUE HILL SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. ET AL

Notice Of Hearing On Petition To Compel Arbitration

Hearing date
Jun 13, 2025
Department
301
Judge
Prevailing
Plaintiff
Next hearing
Sep 15, 2025

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffJAYSON ALPON
DefendantBLUE HILL SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, INC.

Ruling

Matter on the Law & Motion/Discovery Calendar for Friday, June 13, 2025, line 10, PETITIONER JAYSON ALPON, INDIVIDUALLY Notice Of Hearing On Petition To Compel Arbitration

Petitioner Jayson Alpon moves to compel arbitration against Blue Hill Specialty Insurance Company. Alpon, who was driving for Uber, was in a collision with a driver who did not stop. Petitioner made a claim against Blue Hill and the matter was set to go to arbitration pursuant to Insurance Code 11580.2(f).

Blue Hill asked for a continuance because a passenger in Alpon's rideshare vehicle, Brian Limon Santiago, submitted a claim; Blue Hill now contends that Santiago is a necessary party and asks the court to order Santiago to arbitration as well. Santiago is not a party to this action and has not been served with process that would provide the court with jurisdiction to issue orders to him.

The court orders the parties to arbitrate this dispute and to select an arbitrator within 90 days to schedule the arbitration. This gives Blue Hill time to secure Santiago's presence including through a petition to compel arbitration if needed. The court sets the matter for a status hearing on September 15, 2025 at 9 a.m. in Department 301. If the parties have not agreed on an arbitrator and commenced the arbitration by that date, each party is to submit three suggested arbitrators by supplemental briefing due five court days in advance of the continued hearing date.

For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 301 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 301 Zoom ID 161 502 4290; Passcode 700956.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.

Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept301tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing. = (302/CVA)

The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion or Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. = (302/CVA) | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share