DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC24620755·sf·Civil·Discovery Dispute
Hearing about 1 year agoGRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Xue to pay $500 in sanctions to Round One. Round One to serve amended responses to RFAs 7, 9, 11, 14, and 17 within 20 days.

ALEXANDER XUE VS. ROUND ONE ENTERTAINMENT INC

Motion To Compel Further Responses To Requests For Admission; Request For Monetary Sanctions

Hearing date
Jul 1, 2025
Department
301
Judge
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$500

Parties

PlaintiffALEXANDER XUE
DefendantROUND ONE ENTERTAINMENT INC

Ruling

Matter on the Law & Motion/Discovery Calendar for Tuesday July 1, 2025, line 11, PLAINTIFF ALEXANDER XUE'S Motion To Compel Further Responses To Requests For Admission, Set One Request For Monetary Sanctions Against Defendant And Its Counsel Of Record

Plaintiff Alexander Xue moves to compel further responses to his first set of requests for admission from defendant Round One Entertainment Inc. For the reasons stated herein the motion is granted in part and denied in part. *THE COURT'S FULL AND COMPLETE TENTATIVE RULING HAS BEEN EMAILED TO COUNSEL*

Both parties seek sanctions. Some of Round One's objections lacked merit, but Xue's motion significantly overreached, especially in his demand for unqualified admissions that the court lacks the power to order Round One to make. The court finds both parties' positions lacked substantial justification in some regards but Round One is overall the prevailing party. The court orders Xue to pay $500 in sanctions to Round One within 20 days of entry of this order. Round One's amended responses to RFAs 7, 9, 11, 14, and 17 shall be served within 20 days of entry of this order. Round One as the prevailing party shall prepare the written order.

For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 301 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 301 Zoom ID 161 502 4290; Passcode 700956.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.

Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept301tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing. Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept301tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.

The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion or Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. = (302/CVA) | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share