DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC24616815·sf·Civil·Anti-SLAPP
Hearing about 1 year agoTENTATIVE RULING PART 2 OF 2

WUWTA, INC, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION VS. DR. MEHDI MATIN ET AL

THIRD AMENDED NOTICE OF MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS UNDER CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 425.16

Hearing date
Jun 9, 2025
Department
301
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Attorney Fees rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffWUWTA, INC, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
DefendantDR. MEHDI MATIN

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Law & Motion / Discovery Dept 301 - CGC24616815 - June 9, 2025 Hearing date: June 9, 2025 Case number: CGC24616815 Case title: WUWTA, INC, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION VS. DR. MEHDI MATIN ET AL Case Number: | | CGC24616815 | Case Title: | | WUWTA, INC, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION VS. DR. MEHDI MATIN ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-06-09 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | PLAINTIFF WUWTA, INC, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION THIRD AMENDED NOTICE OF MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS UNDER CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 425.16 (TENTATIVE RULING PART 2 OF 2) | Rulings: | | Matter on the Law & Motion/Discovery Calendar for Monday, June 09, 2025, line 2, PLAINTIFF WUWTA, INC, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION THIRD AMENDED NOTICE OF MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS UNDER CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 425.16 (TENTATIVE RULING PART 2 OF 2) | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share