| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
Defendant General Motors LLC's Motion for Summary Judgment or, alternatively, for Summary Adjudication
SF Superior Court - Law & Motion / Discovery Dept 301 - CGC24613675 - June 10, 2025 Hearing date: June 10, 2025 Case number: CGC24613675 Case title: LUIS ENRIQUE SANDOVAL FIGUEROA VS. GENERAL MOTORS LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY ET AL Case Number: | | CGC24613675 | Case Title: | | LUIS ENRIQUE SANDOVAL FIGUEROA VS. GENERAL MOTORS LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-06-10 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | DEFENDANT GENERAL MOTORS LLC'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION (TENTATIVE RULING PART 2 OF 2) | Rulings: | | Matter on the Law & Motion/Discovery Calendar for Tuesday, June 10, 2025, line 6 DEFENDANT GENERAL MOTORS LLC'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION (TENTATIVE RULING PART 2 OF 2)
Plaintiff cannot establish cause of action two (implied warranty). The undisputed evidence shows that the vehicle was used and as explained, defendant was not a seller or distributor of the vehicle. (UMF 2; Nunez v. FCA US LLC (2021) 61 Cal.App.5th 385, 398 [only distributors or sellers of used goods-not manufacturers of new goods-have implied warranty obligations in the sale of used goods under the Song-Beverly Act.].)
The court denies plaintiff's request for a continuance per CCP 437c(h). This case has been pending since 2024, the trial is set for next month, and plaintiff has not shown diligence. (Cooksey v. Alexakis (2004) 123 Cal.App.4th 246, 257 [lack of diligence basis to deny CCP 437c(h) continuance request].)
For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 301 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 301 Zoom ID 161 502 4290; Passcode 700956.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.
Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept301tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept301tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.
The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion or Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. (end of tentative ruling part 2 of 2) = (302/CVA) | |