| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
Motion To Compel Defendant Don Angelo Inc.'S Further Responses To Plaintiff'S Special Interrogatories, Set Two, Numbers 25, 31, 32 And 49; Request For Sanctions Against Defendant And Its Attorney Of Record
Matter on the Law & Motion/Discovery Calendar for Tuesday July 15, 2025, line 3, PLAINTIFFs LELAND EVANS, JUAN REYES' Motion To Compel Defendant Don Angelo Inc.'S Further Responses To Plaintiff'S Special Interrogatories, Set Two, Numbers 25, 31, 32 And 49; Request For Sanctions Against Defendant And Its Attorney Of Record, Gregory De La Pena, In The Amount Of $1,5181.42 Denied as moot without prejudice.
Plaintiff Leland Evans moves to compel defendant Don Angelo Inc.'s further reponses to his special interrogatory numbers 25, 31, 32, and 49 and for sanctions. Don Angelo responds that it will amend before the hearing date. No reply brief was filed. Service of amended responses does not moot a discovery motion or a sanctions request. (Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting, Inc. v. Pacific Healthcare Consultants (2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 390.)
Here, however, Evans has not replied to say whether or not he is satisfied with Don Angelo's amended response. The court's indicated is to take the motion off calendar, without prejudice to any further relief Evans may seek concerning the amended responses. The parties may meet and confer concerning the amended responses, and if Evans is unsatisfied he may renew the motion including the request for sanctions.
For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 301 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 301 Zoom ID 161 502 4290; Passcode 700956.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.
Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept301tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.
Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept301tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.
The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion or Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. = (302/CVA) | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”