Notice Of Motion And Motion For Order Adding Case To June 26, 2025 Status Conference
SF Superior Court - Asbestos Law & Motion - CGC06450901 - June 3, 2025 Hearing date: June 3, 2025 Case number: CGC06450901 Case title: RALPH METREYEON VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al Case Number: | | CGC06450901 | Case Title: | | RALPH METREYEON VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al | Court Date: | | 2025-06-03 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion For Order Adding Case To June 26, 2025 Status Conference | Rulings: | | On Asbestos Law and Motion Calendar for Tuesday, June 3, 2025, in Department 304, Line 4.
Plaintiff's Motion for Order Adding Case to the June 26, 2025, Status Conference is GRANTED. No opposition filed. The Court has executed Plaintiff's proposed order. The moving party shall lodge with the clerk in Department 304 by the time set for this hearing a proposed order repeating verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling.
Any party wishing to contest the tentative ruling must email contestasbestostr@sftc.org by 4:00 p.m. on the day before the hearing and state their intention to contest. If a hearing is requested, it will be on June 3, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. Attorneys may appear in person or remotely via zoom: Meeting ID 160 757 8308; Passcode: 485029. Face coverings are optional.
The Court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law and Motion department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: Their name, CSR and telephone number, and their individual work email address. There will be only one official record. If the parties cannot agree, the Court will designate a qualified court reporter to provide the official transcript for the matter, and the party or parties will bear the cost. = (EPS/304) | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”