DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD26681709·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing 3 months agoDENIED without prejudice

ROGER SALBINO VS. JUDITA DILOY

Notice Of Motion And Motion For Order Establishing Deemed Admissions

Hearing date
May 20, 2026
Department
501
Judge
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffROGER SALBINO
DefendantJUDITA DILOY

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD26681709 - May 20, 2026 Hearing date: May 20, 2026 Case number: CUD26681709 Case title: ROGER SALBINO VS. JUDITA DILOY Case Number: | | CUD26681709 | Case Title: | | ROGER SALBINO VS. JUDITA DILOY | Court Date: | | 2026-05-20 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion For Order Establishing Deemed Admissions | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for May 20, 2026. Line 13.

PLAINTIFF ROGER SALBINO, AS TRUSTEE OF THE DAMASO SIPIT AND ANGELINE SIPIT REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST AGREEMENT Notice Of Motion And Motion For Order Establishing Deemed Admissions is DENIED without prejudice. Declaration of Plaintiff's counsel filed April 28, 2026 is not sufficient to show that Defendant failed to filed to serve a timely response to the discovery by the due date of April 27, 2026.=(501/DWH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share