DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26CV-00957·merced·Civil·Civil
Hearing 3 months agoAppearance required.

Sairam Vengala vs. Tanya Boffman, et al

Ex Parte: Setting Aside Default & Staying Execution of Judgment

Hearing date
May 20, 2026
Department
9
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Ex Parte Application rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffSairam Vengala
DefendantTanya Boffman

Ruling

627 W. 21st Street, Merced

Wednesday, May 20, 2026 1:15 p.m.

The following tentative rulings shall become the ruling of the court unless a party gives notice of intention to appear as follows: 1. You must call (209) 725-4240 to notify the court of your intent to appear.

2. You must give notice to all other parties before 4:00 p.m. of your intent to appear. Per California Rules of Court, rule 3.1308(a)(1), failure to do both items 1 and 2 will result in no oral argument. Note: Notifying CourtCall (the court’s telephonic appearance provider) of your intent to appear does not satisfy the requirement of notifying the court.

Case No. Title / Description

26CV-00957 Sairam Vengala vs. Tanya Boffman, et al

Ex Parte: Setting Aside Default & Staying Execution of Judgment

Appearance required.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share