DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
1·orange·Civil·Motion to Withdraw Counsel
Hearing in about 2 hoursNo Tentative.

Owen vs. Aziyo Biologics, Inc.

Motion – To Withdraw Counsel

Hearing date
Sep 11, 2026
Department
W8
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

DefendantELUTIA INC. f/k/a AZIYO BIOLOGICS, INC.

Attorneys

JORDAN S. TABAK(BOWMAN AND BROOKE LLP)for Defendant
ERIC D. OLSON(BOWMAN AND BROOKE LLP)for Defendant

Ruling

avoid such, please log in and test your equipment in advance of the hearing. Also, if technological or audibility issues arise during the proceeding, please call (657) 622-5908.

All remote video participants shall comply with the court’s “Guidelines for Remote appearances”, found at https://www.occourts.org/system/files/guidelinesforremoteproceedings.pdf.

IN-PERSON: Parties preferring to appear in-person for a law and motion hearing may do so, consistent with Section 367.75 of the Code of Civil Procedure and Orange County Local Rule 375.

PUBLIC ACCESS: The courtroom remains open for all evidentiary and non-evidentiary proceedings.

No filming, broadcasting, photography, or electronic recording is permitted of the video session pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 1.150 and Orange County Superior Court rule 180.

September 11, 2026

# Case Name 1 Owen vs. Aziyo Motion – To Withdraw Counsel Biologics, Inc. No Tentative.

Defendant ELUTIA INC. f/k/a AZIYO BIOLOGICS, INC. by and through its counsel BOWMAN AND BROOKE LLP, moves to withdraw the appearance of JORDAN S. TABAK and ERIC D. OLSON (both of BOWMAN AND BROOKE LLP) as counsel for Elutia Inc. According to the motion, other attorneys of Bowman and Brooke, LLP, would continue to represent Elutia Inc.

Defendant cites no authority in support of the motion. Indeed, no memorandum of points and authorities were filed. Notably, Bowman and Brooke LLP is the attorney of record for the defendant.

Further, no proof of service is provided showing service on either Jordan S. Tabak or Eric D. Olson, to whom the motion is directed. Also, no evidence is submitted showing

2

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share