Owen vs. Aziyo Biologics, Inc.
Motion – To Withdraw Counsel
Motion type
Parties
Attorneys
Ruling
avoid such, please log in and test your equipment in advance of the hearing. Also, if technological or audibility issues arise during the proceeding, please call (657) 622-5908.
All remote video participants shall comply with the court’s “Guidelines for Remote appearances”, found at https://www.occourts.org/system/files/guidelinesforremoteproceedings.pdf.
IN-PERSON: Parties preferring to appear in-person for a law and motion hearing may do so, consistent with Section 367.75 of the Code of Civil Procedure and Orange County Local Rule 375.
PUBLIC ACCESS: The courtroom remains open for all evidentiary and non-evidentiary proceedings.
No filming, broadcasting, photography, or electronic recording is permitted of the video session pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 1.150 and Orange County Superior Court rule 180.
September 11, 2026
# Case Name 1 Owen vs. Aziyo Motion – To Withdraw Counsel Biologics, Inc. No Tentative.
Defendant ELUTIA INC. f/k/a AZIYO BIOLOGICS, INC. by and through its counsel BOWMAN AND BROOKE LLP, moves to withdraw the appearance of JORDAN S. TABAK and ERIC D. OLSON (both of BOWMAN AND BROOKE LLP) as counsel for Elutia Inc. According to the motion, other attorneys of Bowman and Brooke, LLP, would continue to represent Elutia Inc.
Defendant cites no authority in support of the motion. Indeed, no memorandum of points and authorities were filed. Notably, Bowman and Brooke LLP is the attorney of record for the defendant.
Further, no proof of service is provided showing service on either Jordan S. Tabak or Eric D. Olson, to whom the motion is directed. Also, no evidence is submitted showing
2
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”