DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CU26-05820·solano·Civil·Petition for Order to Abate Substandard Building
Hearing in about 2 hoursCONTINUED

CITY OF BENICIA v. CHARLA A. WIMMER

Petition for Order to Abate Substandard Building and Appoint Receiver

Hearing date
Sep 11, 2026
Department
3
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$10,000

Parties

PetitionerCITY OF BENICIA
RespondentCHARLA A. WIMMER

Ruling

Case No. CU26-05820

Petition for Order to Abate Substandard Building and Appoint Receiver

Petitioner CITY OF BENICIA seeks an order declaring the property at 75 Buena Vista Street, Benicia, California 94510 substandard and appointing a receiver to abate the nuisance.

Petitioner has met all statutory notice requirements for this petition in light of its additional filings from August 10 and 12, 2026 detailing its efforts to contract Respondent in Montana and service of the petition on her out-of-state addresses by first-class mail. Petitioner presents sufficient evidence of the property’s violation of numerous building standard regulations and ordinances. The property owner and potential heirs and other interested persons have been afforded a reasonable opportunity to correct the property’s nuisance conditions and has not shown ability or will to do so.

The court is inclined to grant the petition; however, Petitioner is to appear and offer additional information to the court as to why it has selected a receiver based in Southern California, as the court requested at the July 21, 2026 hearing on this petition. The court additionally notes that the requested bond amount of $10,000 appears low for the proposed receivership.

Join ZoomGov Meeting https://www.zoomgov.com/j/1602210102?pwd=emlhR29SczExam56NFFqWHFvSitmZz09

Meeting ID: 160 221 0102 Passcode: 650928

One tap mobile +16692545252,,1602210102#,,,,*650928# US (San Jose) +16692161590,,1602210102#,,,,*650928# US (San Jose)

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share