DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
22CV018811·alameda·Civil·Consumer Protection
Hearing todayGRANTED, in Part

CONSUMER ADVOCACY GROUP, INC vs KOREAN FARM, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, et al.

Motion for Protective Order

Hearing date
Sep 10, 2026
Department
520
Prevailing
Moving Party
Next hearing
Sep 14, 2026
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffCONSUMER ADVOCACY GROUP, INC
DefendantKOREAN FARM, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION

Ruling

22CV018811: CONSUMER ADVOCACY GROUP, INC vs KOREAN FARM, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, et al. 09/10/2026 Hearing on Motion for Protective Order Continued from 6-26 in Department 520

Tentative Ruling - 09/10/2026 Jamilah A. Jefferson

The Motion for Protective Order filed by Korean Farm, Inc., a California Corporation on 02/05/2026 is Granted in Part.

The Court is in receipt of the parties' proposed orders submitted on August 7, 2026. The Court will review the proposed orders and issue an order.

The matter is continued to September 14, 2026 for entry of order only - no appearances.

The Hearing on Motion for Protective Order Continued from June 26, 2026 scheduled for 09/10/2026 is continued to 09/14/2026 at 10:45 AM in Department 520 at Hayward Hall of Justice.

NOTICE: This tentative ruling will automatically become the court’s final order on September 11, 2026 unless, by no later than 4:00 P.M. on September 10, 2026, a party to the action notifies BOTH: 1) the court by emailing Dept520@alameda.courts.ca.gov; AND 2) all opposing counsel or self- represented parties (by telephone or email) that the party is contesting this tentative ruling.

The subject line (RE:) of the email must state: “Request for CONTESTED HEARING: [the case name], [number].” When a party emails to contest a tentative ruling, the party must identify the specific holding(s) within the ruling they wish to contest via oral argument.

The court does not provide court reporters for hearings in civil departments. A party who wants a record of the proceedings must engage a private court reporter. (Local Rule 3.95.) Any privately retained court reporter must also participate via video conference. Their email must be provided to the court at the time the Notice of Contest is emailed.

ALL CONTESTED LAW AND MOTION HEARINGS ARE CONDUCTED VIA REMOTE VIDEO unless an in person appearance is required by the court. Invitations to participate in the video proceeding will be sent by the court upon receipt of timely notice of contest. A party may give email notice they will appear in court in person for the hearing, however all other counsel/parties and the JUDGE MAY APPEAR REMOTELY.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share