DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
PRO2200411·marin·Probate·Probate Status Conference
Hearing todayCONTINUED

PATRICIA JUDITH CURLEY-LINDSEY-RANZER, ESTATE OF

Status Conference

Hearing date
Sep 10, 2026
Department
C
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Oct 8, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Ruling

PLEASE NOTE: Probate cases that are designated as confidential by California law will not be posted online. For tentative rulings in those matters, please contact the judicial secretary at (415) 444- 7260. Page 5 | 7

PR0001710 IN THE MATTER OF PAUL KRAUS

Status Conference - Filing of Final Inventory and Appraisal

Ruling. Personal representative Anne F. Smith and attorney Nancy C. Field are ordered to appear. The Court notes that a Partial Inventory and Appraisal has been filed.

PR0001735 IN THE MATTER OF JOHN CLARENCE HENSLEY

Status Conference - Filing of Final Inventory and Appraisal

Ruling. This matter is ordered off calendar; the Final Inventory and Appraisal has been filed.

PR0001737 IN THE MATTER OF MARJORIE NELL KERR

Status Conference - Filing of Final Inventory and Appraisal

Ruling. Personal representative William Forbes and attorney Amir S. Sarreshtehdary are ordered to appear.

PR0001742 IN THE MATTER OF DANIEL EDWARD CROSS

Status Conference - Filing of Final Inventory and Appraisal

Ruling. This matter is ordered off calendar; the Final Inventory and Appraisal has been filed.

PRO2200411 PATRICIA JUDITH CURLEY-LINDSEY-RANZER, ESTATE OF

Status Conference - Filing of Final Inventory and Appraisal

Ruling. This matter is continued to October 8, 2026, at 1:30 p.m. Personal representative is ordered to file a Final Inventory and Appraisal that reports the escheated assets in the manner set forth in the Probate Referee Guide issued by the California Probate Referees’ Association:

“ASSETS WHICH HAVE ESCHEATED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

“Any assets which have escheated to the State of California should be reported on the Inventory & Appraisal on the schedule as would be appropriate before the escheatment occurred. For example, a cash bank account would have been reported on Attachment #1 before the escheatment and should be reported as an Attachment #1 asset on the Inventory. Similarly, a stock asset would have been

PLEASE NOTE: Probate cases that are designated as confidential by California law will not be posted online. For tentative rulings in those matters, please contact the judicial secretary at (415) 444- 7260. Page 6 | 7

reported on Attachment #2 before the escheatment and should be reported as an Attachment #2 asset on the Inventory.”

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share