DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
FDV-10-808198·sf·FamilyLaw·Visitation and Anger Management
Hearing todayOn the Court’s own motion, this matter is continued to September 22, 2026 at 9:00 AM.

Monisha Sullivan v. Anthony Scott Grady

Request for Order for Change of Visitation (Parenting Time); Review Hearings; Anger Management

Hearing date
Sep 10, 2026
Department
403
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Sep 22, 2026
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Parties

PetitionerMonisha Sullivan
RespondentAnthony Scott Grady

Ruling

1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 4

5) 6 MONISHA SULLIVAN,) Case Number: FDV-10-808198) 7 Petitioner) Hearing Date: September 10, 2026) 8 VS.) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM) 9 ANTHONY SCOTT GRADY,) Department: 403) 10 Respondent) Presiding: JPT JUDITH E. HARDING) 11) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VISITATION (PARENTING TIME), AND REQUEST 13 FOR REVIEW HEARINGS AND ANGER MANAGEMENT 14 TENTATIVE RULING 15 Having read and considered the pleadings, declarations, and other evidence submitted in this matter, the 16 Court makes the following findings and orders: 17 A.

Procedural History 18 1) The parties are Petitioner, Monisha Sullivan (Mother) and Respondent, Anthony Scott Grady 19 (Father). They share one minor child named Anaeya Grady (06/15/15). 20 2) On June 3, 2026, Mother filed a Request for Order seeking a modification of visitation, request 21 for review hearings and anger management orders. Mother alleges Father has been threatening to 22 her and any people involved in facilitating exchanges. 23 3) On June 24, 2026, Father filed a Responsive Declaration to Mother’s Request for Order in which 24 he alleges Mother has not been complying with the Court orders and that she is unwilling to co- 25 parent. 26 4) On August 10, 2026, Mother filed a proof of personal service of her Request for Order. 27 5) On August 10, 2026, the Court held a Readiness hearing and referred the parties to FCS 28 Mediation to occur on August 31, 2026 and set the matter for hearing on September 10, 2026. 29 B.

Findings and Order

1 1) This Court has jurisdiction to make child custody orders in this case under the Uniform Child 2 Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act. A violation of this order may subject the party in 3 violation to civil or criminal penalties, or both. The country of habitual residence of the minor 4 child is the United States. 5 2) On the Court’s own motion, this matter is continued to September 22, 2026 at 9:00 AM in 6 Dept. 403. 7 3) No appearances are required on September 10, 2026. 8 4) The Court will prepare the Findings and Order After Hearing. 9

13

17

21

25

29

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share