JOHN STEWART COMPANY VS. LESLIE MONCADA-LEWIS ET AL
Notice Of Motion And Motion For Terminating Sanctions Against Defendants Leslie Moncada-Lewis And Joe Lewis Jr. Aka Joe Lewis
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25680248 - September 10, 2026 Hearing date: September 10, 2026 Case number: CUD25680248 Case title: JOHN STEWART COMPANY VS. LESLIE MONCADA-LEWIS ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25680248 | Case Title: | | JOHN STEWART COMPANY VS. LESLIE MONCADA-LEWIS ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-09-10 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion For Terminating Sanctions Against Defendants Leslie Moncada-Lewis And Joe Lewis Jr. Aka Joe Lewis | Rulings: | | On the Real Property / Housing Motion calendar for September 10, 2026, line 8.
Plaintiff's Motion for Terminating Sanctions is DENIED without prejudice. Declaration of counsel states only that she has not received responses to her email address as of the day after the discovery was due. Nothing in the July 24, 2026 discovery order mandates service by email only. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”