DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25680248·sf·Civil·Real Property / Housing
Hearing todayDENIED without prejudice

JOHN STEWART COMPANY VS. LESLIE MONCADA-LEWIS ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion For Terminating Sanctions Against Defendants Leslie Moncada-Lewis And Joe Lewis Jr. Aka Joe Lewis

Hearing date
Sep 10, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Sanctions rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffJOHN STEWART COMPANY
DefendantLESLIE MONCADA-LEWIS
DefendantJOE LEWIS JR. AKA JOE LEWIS

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25680248 - September 10, 2026 Hearing date: September 10, 2026 Case number: CUD25680248 Case title: JOHN STEWART COMPANY VS. LESLIE MONCADA-LEWIS ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25680248 | Case Title: | | JOHN STEWART COMPANY VS. LESLIE MONCADA-LEWIS ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-09-10 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion For Terminating Sanctions Against Defendants Leslie Moncada-Lewis And Joe Lewis Jr. Aka Joe Lewis | Rulings: | | On the Real Property / Housing Motion calendar for September 10, 2026, line 8.

Plaintiff's Motion for Terminating Sanctions is DENIED without prejudice. Declaration of counsel states only that she has not received responses to her email address as of the day after the discovery was due. Nothing in the July 24, 2026 discovery order mandates service by email only. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share