DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
19PR000227·napa·Civil·Probate
Hearing todayCONTINUED

Estate of Christopher Matthew Gillespie

First and Final Account and Report of Executor; Petition for Settlement and Final Distribution

Hearing date
Sep 10, 2026
Department
Dept. B
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Oct 13, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Ruling

16.) Thus, Mr. Vu explicitly alleges that all of the protected activities alleged occurred after Ms. Huong Vu passed away.

The Court is aware of no authority providing that an estate may maintain a claim for elder abuse based on allegations that a defendant took, secreted, appropriated, obtained, or retained real or personal property of an elder after the elder’s death. (See Ring v. Harmon (2021) 72 Cal.App.5th 844, 851.) [“No authority supports the notion that the personal representative of a probate estate, acting in that capacity, has standing to bring an elder abuse claim on behalf of a beneficiary of that estate”].)

Based on the foregoing, Mr. Eriksson fails to show that either the second or sixth cause of action arises out of the protected activities. For this reason, the Court does not have authority to strike paragraphs 14, 15, 16, and/or 18 pursuant to Section 425.16,

However, in light of the Court’s ruling granting Mr. Eriksson’s motion to strike the second through fifth causes of action, the finding that these allegations cannot, as a matter of law, support either of the remaining claims – the first and sixth causes of action – renders the allegations irrelevant. While the Court does not have authority to strike paragraphs 14, 15, 16, and/or 18 pursuant to Section 425.16, it does have authority to strike them pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 436 on grounds that they are irrelevant.

Shirley Jo Kilgore v. Piner’s Nursing Home 26CV001142

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO WRITTEN DISCOVERY, SET ONE; REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS

APPEARANCE REQUIRED.

PROBATE CALENDAR – Hon. Joseph J. Solga, Dept. B (Historic Courthouse) at 8:30 a.m.

Estate of Christopher Matthew Gillespie 19PR000227

FIRST AND FINAL ACCOUNT AND REPORT OF EXECUTOR AND PETITION FOR ITS SETTLEMENT AND FOR FINAL DISTRIBUTION

TENTATIVE RULING: In light of the Supplemental Briefing and Request for Continuance, filed September 3, 2026, the matter is CONTINUED to October 13, 2026, at 8:30 a.m. in Dept. B. By October 6, 2026, Executor and Objector shall each, or jointly, file and serve supplemental briefing as to the status of the matter.

In The Matter of The Ashe Family Trust 20PR000163

8

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share