DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
2026PRDE059575·ventura·Probate·Probate
Hearing todayDENIED

IN THE MATTER OF WANDA LEE BURNETT

Petition for Order to Deposit Estate Funds in a Blocked Account

Hearing date
Sep 10, 2026
Department
J6
Judge
Prevailing
Opposing Party

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

OtherWanda Lee Burnett
PetitionerProbate Advance
RespondentKristie Lee Miller

Ruling

2026PRDE059575: IN THE MATTER OF WANDA LEE BURNETT 09/10/2026 in Department J6 Hearing on Petition for Order to Deposit Estate Funds in a Blocked Account

Probate Advance makes a request, pursuant to Probate Code section 9703 to order that the personal representative shall establish a blocked account pursuant to the Blocked Account Agreement; That all Estate funds, now and in the future, shall be deposited by the personal representative and heir in the blocked account and withdrawn only upon order of the Court pursuant to the Blocked Account Agreement

Kristie Lee Miller was appointed executor of the estate, with full IAEA powers and bond waived.

Executor is opposed to such an order and there are no grounds to grant the petition. Probate Code section 9703 allows the personal representative to file an application for an order that money be deposit into a blocked account.

Probate Advance has provided no facts that would warrant the necessity to require a blocked account.

The fact that a beneficiary has signed a “Blocked Account” agreement has no power over the personal representative and does not require the executor to make such an application.

The court intends to deny the petition.

1

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share