DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
2025CUCL044917·ventura·Civil·Civil
Hearing todayGRANTED

OVERTON FUNDING v. AMERICAN SPECIALTY ADHESIVE PRODUCTS, INC., et al.

Motion for Mandatory Relief from Default and Default Judgment

Hearing date
Sep 10, 2026
Department
42
Judge
Prevailing
Moving Party
Next hearing
Sep 29, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffOVERTON FUNDING
DefendantAMERICAN SPECIALTY ADHESIVE PRODUCTS, INC.

Ruling

2025CUCL044917: OVERTON FUNDING, vs AMERICAN SPECIALTY ADHESIVE PRODUCTS, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, et al. 09/10/2026 in Department 42 Motion for Mandatory Relief from Default and Default Judgment

Tentative Ruling: The motion is granted. Defense counsel has established that Defendant is entitled to mandatory relief under CCP section 473b. The default judgment is vacated and set aside. Defendant is ordered to file its answer forthwith, and in no event later than September 24, 2026.

Plaintiff is entitled to attorney’s fees and costs for the time and cost expended obtaining the default, opposing the instant motion and litigating the amount of fees and costs. Plaintiff shall file a declaration in support of any attorney fees/costs claimed no later than September 24, 2026. The Court sets a hearing on September 29, 2026 at 8:30 to decide the amount of attorney fees/costs that will be awarded to Plaintiff pursuant to CCP 473(b). Any opposition shall be made orally. To the extent the parties can agree on a reasonable amount of fees/costs, they shall file a joint stipulation advising the Court that no hearing is necessary and requesting that the hearing be vacated.

Defendant to give notice.

1

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share