DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26CV-00199·merced·Civil·Collections
Hearing todayAppearance requested

Midland Credit Management, Inc. vs. Dashawn Chambers

Status Hearing – Status of Arbitration

Hearing date
Sep 10, 2026
Department
9
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffMidland Credit Management, Inc.
DefendantDashawn Chambers

Ruling

26CV-00199 Midland Credit Management, Inc. vs. Dashawn Chambers

Status Hearing – Status of Arbitration

Appearance requested to inform the Court of the status of arbitration and completion of arbitration proceedings.

26CV-04366 [Parties’ names withheld pursuant to CCP § 1161.2(a)(1)]

Motion to Quash Service of Summons

DROPPED from calendar due to lack of notice to the opposing party. The moving defendants have not filed proof of service of the notice of motion and motion. The Court also notes that no proof of service of summons has been filed by Plaintiff.

Demurrer to Complaint

Appearance required. An opposition and reply to an opposition may be made orally at the time of the hearing. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1170, subd. (c).)

26CV-04193 [Parties’ names withheld pursuant to CCP § 1161.2(a)(1)]

Court Trial: Unlawful Detainer

Appearance required.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share