Abhari, et al. v. Farmers Ins. Exchange, et al.
Default Judgment
Motion type
Causes of action
Monetary amounts referenced
Parties
Ruling
(Stanley Mosk Courthouse: Dept. 512) September 10, 2026 DEPARTMENT 512 LAW AND MOTION RULINGS Effective May 4, 2026: Judge Karine Mkrtchyan Presiding Tentative Rulings are posted before the hearing.
If you desire to submit on the tentative ruling, you may do so by e-mailing Dept. 512 (formerly Dept. 54) at the Stanley Mosk Courthouse up until the morning of the motion hearing. The e-mail address is SMCDept512@lacourt.ca.gov. The heading on your e-mail must contain the case name, number, hearing date, and that you submit. The message should indicate your name, contact information, and the party you represent. The party submitting to the tentative must include to the e-mail all other counsel (or party if self-represented) to the action.
Please note that if a party fails to appear at a law and motion hearing without having given notice under California Rules of Court, rule 3.1204, subd. (c), the court may take the matter off calendar, to be reset only upon motion, or may rule on the matter. If only one party has submitted, the Court may still hear the motion at the hearing or adopt the tentative ruling. Please note that the above e-mail address is ONLY to inform the court of your submission on the tentative ruling. All other inquiries will not receive a response.
Case No. | 22STCV24750/23STCV03400 | Case Name: | Abhari, et al. v. Farmers Ins. Exchange, et al. | Hearing Date: | September 10, 2026 | | Defaulting defendant(s) | Bacon-up corporation |
On February 1, 2022, Plaintiff Zia Abhari ("Plaintiff") filed one of the instant actions against Defendants Bacon-Up Corporation, Mazyar Yaghoubian, Farmers Insurance Exchange, Farmers Underwriters Association, and Farmers Group, Inc., and Does 1-1000, alleging causes of action for Intentional Fraud by Concealment, Negligent Misrepresentation, and Intentional Misrepresentation.
On July 16, 2026, default was entered against Bacon-Up Corporation. Plaintiff seeks to enter judgment against Bacon-Up Corporation in the amount of $5,602,410.13 for Negligent Misrepresentation. Plaintiff has submitted some of the requisite documentation and provided some sufficient evidence to support the judgment sought.
However, the Court notes the following deficiencies exist in the Default Judgment Packet: · No Proposed Judgment on JUD-100 Form or a Proposed Judgment meeting the same elements as JUD-100 form was filed · No Doe Dismissal filed.
Further, there are multiple defendants involved in the action(s), and Plaintiff failed to file an application, supported by a showing of grounds, for either separate default judgments or a default against one defendant while the matter proceeds against other defendant(s), if the claims are severable (see Code Civ. Proc., Sec.Sec. 578, 579). The Court declines to enter more than one judgment in this action.
· The requisite Complaint fails to allege sufficient facts to plead a negligent misrepresentation cause of action against Bacon-Up Corporation · The evidence in support of the Default Judgment Packet fails to provide adequate explanation and support for the amount of damages requested · The Court is unable to determine if Plaintiff is seeking punitive damages as part of the default judgment request. If so, Plaintiff has failed to file and serve the requisite notice of punitive damages and the requisite evidence of defendant's wealth
Based on the foregoing, the Default Judgment Packet is DENIED.
Case Number: 23STCV17413 Hearing Date: September 10, 2026 Dept: 512 HEARING DATE: Thurs., September 10, 2026 JUDGE /DEPT: Mkrtchyan/512 CASE NAME: Lu v. Yang, et al. COMP FILED: 07-25-23 CASE NUMBER: 23STCV17413 FAC FILED: 03-07-24 NOTICE: NO PROCEEDINGS: MOTION TO VACATE DISMISSAL AND ENTER JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO CCP 664.6 MOVING PARTY: Plaintiff Yi Ping Lu RESP. PARTY: None ENTER JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION (CCP Sec. 664.6)
TENTATIVE RULING: Plaintiff Yi Ping Lu's unopposed Motion to Enter Judgment Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6 is CONTINUED to Monday, October 12, 2026 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 512 of the Stanley Mosk Courthouse. At least 16 court days prior to the next scheduled hearing, Plaintiff is to file and serve supplemental papers addressing the deficiencies noted herein. Moving party is ordered to give
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”