DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25679294·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing 11 months agoGRANTED

THE JOHN STEWART COMPANY VS. ROBERT LACOME

Notice Of Motion And Motion To Enter Judgment For Possession Pursuant To Stipulation Pursuant To Ccp 664.6

Hearing date
Sep 29, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffTHE JOHN STEWART COMPANY
DefendantROBERT LACOME

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25679294 - September 29, 2025 Hearing date: September 29, 2025 Case number: CUD25679294 Case title: THE JOHN STEWART COMPANY VS. ROBERT LACOME Case Number: | | CUD25679294 | Case Title: | | THE JOHN STEWART COMPANY VS. ROBERT LACOME | Court Date: | | 2025-09-29 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion To Enter Judgment For Possession Pursuant To Stipulation Pursuant To Ccp 664.6 | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court motion calendar for September 29, 2025, line 10.

Plaintiff's Motion to Enter Judgment for Possession Pursuant to Stipulation Pursuant to CCP 664.6 is GRANTED. No opposition filed. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom [Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252]. Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share