American Canyon I. LLC v. City of American Canyon et al
DEFENDANT CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON’S DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT OF PLAINTIFF AMERICAN CANYON 1, LLC
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
limitations one year because the limitations period had not yet expired at the time of decedent’s death.
“Notwithstanding Section 366.2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, if the limitations period otherwise applicable to the action has not expired at the time of the decedent’s death, an action under this chapter may be commenced within one year after the expiration of the limitations period otherwise applicable.” (Prob. Code, § 551.) Section 366.2 provides a similar, but slightly different, provision: “If a person against whom an action may be brought on a liability of the person, whether arising in contract, tort, or otherwise, and whether accrued or not accrued, dies before the expiration of the applicable limitations period, and the cause of action survives, an action may be commenced within one year after the date of death, and the limitations period that would have been applicable does not apply.” (§ 366.2.)2
The Court agrees that Probate Code section 551 applies and extends the statute of limitations. Here, the only allegation relating to Jack Malan’s date of death is in Paragraph 7. Taken as true, Paragraph 7 establishes that Jack Malan passed away, at the latest, on October 20, 2025. It follows that section 335.1’s two-year limitations period (under which Plaintiff had until October 20, 2025 to file an action) had not expired at the time of the decedent’s death. Thus, under Probate Code 551, the action “may be commenced within one year after the expiration of the limitations period otherwise applicable,” or October 21, 2026. Based on the foregoing, the complaint, filed on October 21, 2025, is timely.
Defendants’ attempt in Reply to refute Probate Code section 551’s applicability is unavailing.
Based on the foregoing, the demurrer is OVERRULED. This ruling renders it unnecessary for the Court to consider Defendant’s additional arguments in opposition to the demurrer. (See Opp. 7:12-10:7.)
American Canyon I. LLC v. City of American Canyon et al 26CV001286
DEFENDANT CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON’S DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT OF PLAINTIFF AMERICAN CANYON 1, LLC
TENTATIVE RULING: The demurrer is CONTINUED to September 11, 2026, at 1:30 p.m. in Dept. A. If that date and time do not work for the parties, they shall request oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 2.9 and appear at the hearing.
2 Plaintiff contends that section 366.2 does not apply because the present action is brought on an insured claim for which Probate Code 551 applies. (Opp., 6:3-5.) Defendants implicitly concede this by failing to address it in Reply.
7
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”